An animal, hundreds of miles away, took out a network line.
That's the story from the KLAS Enterprise Imaging Summit I keep coming back to. Not because it's dramatic. Because it's the point. The hard part of cloud and AI isn't the technology anymore. It's the circuits, the people, who breaks a tie, and the day after go-live.
If you lead imaging, here's what the people who've made the move would tell you. I'm not naming anyone. People spoke candidly, and that's worth protecting.
Cloud and AI are tools. Getting them isn't the achievement. What you do with them is.
Many projects still end at go-live. The contract's signed, the switch is flipped, everyone celebrates, and nobody tracks what happens next. The best examples measured ER turnaround, radiologist productivity, even whether radiologists liked the job more. One group took post-processing and routine steps off the radiologist's plate, so reading was all they did.
Try this: before your next project starts, write down the one or two numbers that will tell you it worked a year from now. Then name who watches them.
Engineers design systems to fail safe, or to keep running when something breaks. The real danger is slower. A small workaround becomes routine. Then another. Nobody ever decides to accept the risk. It's called the normalization of deviance.
Imaging is full of it. The downtime procedure nobody has rehearsed. The alert everyone ignores. The manual step that quietly became policy.
Try this: ask your team one question: what have we stopped noticing? You'll learn more from the answers than from most dashboards.
The keynote added one more way to fail, the one clinical care needs: failing right. Things will go wrong. Meet it with honesty and humility, and keep the patient at the center. We don't treat patients, but we decide how much clinicians can trust their tools.
They're asking how to run it. A few ideas came up again and again:
Reporting AI got the most attention. It saves real time once it sits inside the dictation workflow, not next to it.
The bigger shift is from findings to context. Most AI stops at "there's a nodule." The next step is what that means for this patient, given their history, labs, and prior studies. That used to take hours. It's starting to take seconds.
One speaker offered a five-rung ladder for judging any imaging tool, from a 1991 paper by Fryback and Thornbury. Does the image look good? Is the finding right? Did it change the doctor's thinking? Did it change the treatment? Did the patient do better? Most AI stops at rung two.
One health system ran more than ten cancer centers as separate islands. Every region had a "number one" priority, so small projects won and big ones stalled. What fixed it wasn't new software:
The ask to vendors was clear and fair: real support for DICOM, FHIR APIs, and IHE profiles, so the data can move.
One longtime informatics leader shared a wish list for the next archive. It's a good one to hold up against your own roadmap:
The cloud advice was the most practical of the summit:
One academic health system went live on hybrid cloud in under five months. Their lessons:
A pilot asks one question: are we keeping this? An initial site starts a rollout everyone has already committed to. Mix them up and people hold back.
To get out of pilot purgatory, both sides need something at stake:
And remember who decides. A physician may ask for a tool, but techs, nurses, and admin staff decide whether it survives.
The closing fireside chat mapped AI on two axes. One is what it can understand, from a single narrow algorithm up to models that read images, text, and the patient record together. The other is what it can do, from a standalone tool up to running workflows on its own. Most of radiology sits near the start of both.
Moving further takes three things: access to data across the enterprise, a place inside the workflow, and permission to act. Access comes first. We've written about why in The data has to move first.
The hopeful part: when a profession gets more productive, demand tends to grow. The case made was that radiology's role gets bigger, not smaller.
Thanks to everyone who shared so openly, on stage and around the tables.
One question before you go: what's the workaround your team has stopped noticing? Tell me on LinkedIn. I'd like to know if it's the same one I keep hearing about.